<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1up: No LAN support for Starcraft 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/</link>
	<description>The Stupid Gamer &#124; Video Games &#38; Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosetta Horton</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-82500</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosetta Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-82500</guid>
		<description>OK cool to see- new blogs are always helpful! Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK cool to see- new blogs are always helpful! Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenda Standfield</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-82454</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda Standfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-82454</guid>
		<description>Automated Forex Trading System using MT4 Expert Advisor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automated Forex Trading System using MT4 Expert Advisor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omer Pergerson</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-82433</link>
		<dc:creator>Omer Pergerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-82433</guid>
		<description>OK nice to see- new blogs are always welcome! Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK nice to see- new blogs are always welcome! Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-77167</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-77167</guid>
		<description>Found your site just now- really great, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found your site just now- really great, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starly Jackson</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-73830</link>
		<dc:creator>Starly Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-73830</guid>
		<description>Without any network support, the upcoming title reveals 1UP will instead allow gamers to choose from an array of advanced communication options Blizzard representative Bob Colayco revealed, We don&#039;t currently plan to support LAN play with StarCraft II, as we are building Battlenet to be the ideal 

No Responses to StarCraft II to come without LAN support Post a comment AVG introduces LinkScanner: Safety from online threats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without any network support, the upcoming title reveals 1UP will instead allow gamers to choose from an array of advanced communication options Blizzard representative Bob Colayco revealed, We don&#8217;t currently plan to support LAN play with StarCraft II, as we are building Battlenet to be the ideal </p>
<p>No Responses to StarCraft II to come without LAN support Post a comment AVG introduces LinkScanner: Safety from online threats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65809</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-65809</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fine. . .for Blizzard.  The honest consumer still loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fine. . .for Blizzard.  The honest consumer still loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtass</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65586</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-65586</guid>
		<description>You have some very valid points.  However, upon Starcraft 2&#039;s release, do you think there would be more people trying to play it without an internet connection, or more people trying to pirate it?  I&#039;d say the latter.  It&#039;s about opportunity cost.  Blizzard can&#039;t make everyone happy.  They&#039;re just trying to maximize profits, albeit in a very annoying way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have some very valid points.  However, upon Starcraft 2&#8242;s release, do you think there would be more people trying to play it without an internet connection, or more people trying to pirate it?  I&#8217;d say the latter.  It&#8217;s about opportunity cost.  Blizzard can&#8217;t make everyone happy.  They&#8217;re just trying to maximize profits, albeit in a very annoying way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65343</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-65343</guid>
		<description>@Curtass

Yes.  It is a Very Bad Thing.  I bought a game, but I have to activate it online to play it.  What happens if I lose my internet connection for some reason (e.g. lost my job and can&#039;t afford it now, moved to an area without tolerable connection) and it can&#039;t be restored for some time (weeks, months).  Now how do I play my game that I paid $60 for?  And yet, were I to pirate the game for free, I wouldn&#039;t have to worry about online checks.  Hmm.  Which is the better value there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Curtass</p>
<p>Yes.  It is a Very Bad Thing.  I bought a game, but I have to activate it online to play it.  What happens if I lose my internet connection for some reason (e.g. lost my job and can&#8217;t afford it now, moved to an area without tolerable connection) and it can&#8217;t be restored for some time (weeks, months).  Now how do I play my game that I paid $60 for?  And yet, were I to pirate the game for free, I wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about online checks.  Hmm.  Which is the better value there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtass</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-65106</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-65106</guid>
		<description>@Curtis

I blame Valve’s Steam system for forcing me to become accustomed to online activation schemes. The fact that Blizzard is trying to force more online checks to prevent piracy is just the way the industry is headed.

Is this a bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Curtis</p>
<p>I blame Valve’s Steam system for forcing me to become accustomed to online activation schemes. The fact that Blizzard is trying to force more online checks to prevent piracy is just the way the industry is headed.</p>
<p>Is this a bad thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/06/30/1up-no-lan-support-for-starcraft-2/comment-page-1/#comment-64974</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1716#comment-64974</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember the last time I went to a LAN party, but I play games over my home network with my wife from time to time and it seems kind of annoying to add the hurdle of going online to do so.   It&#039;s not a deal-breaker though.  

I blame Valve&#039;s Steam system for forcing me to become accustomed to online activation schemes.  The fact that Blizzard is trying to force more online checks to prevent piracy is just the way the industry is headed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember the last time I went to a LAN party, but I play games over my home network with my wife from time to time and it seems kind of annoying to add the hurdle of going online to do so.   It&#8217;s not a deal-breaker though.  </p>
<p>I blame Valve&#8217;s Steam system for forcing me to become accustomed to online activation schemes.  The fact that Blizzard is trying to force more online checks to prevent piracy is just the way the industry is headed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

