<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former 1up Show staff finds their permanent home at Area 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stupidgamer.com/2009/01/21/former-1up-show-staff-finds-their-permanent-home-at-area-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/01/21/former-1up-show-staff-finds-their-permanent-home-at-area-5/</link>
	<description>Video Games and related rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtass</title>
		<link>http://stupidgamer.com/2009/01/21/former-1up-show-staff-finds-their-permanent-home-at-area-5/comment-page-1/#comment-36840</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stupidgamer.com/?p=1293#comment-36840</guid>
		<description>I thought 1up was a good source for info and the former staff wrote some good reviews and articles.  However, I felt the site was assembled in a rather haphazard, sloppy fashion, and quite frankly, was fugly.

It&#039;s good to see the folks get back on their feet so quickly.

Speaking of fugliness, what&#039;s up with the background on this site?  Wasn&#039;t there a contest MONTHS ago that allowed readers to design a new background?  What ever happened to that?  This one actually isn&#039;t that bad, though.  Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 1up was a good source for info and the former staff wrote some good reviews and articles.  However, I felt the site was assembled in a rather haphazard, sloppy fashion, and quite frankly, was fugly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see the folks get back on their feet so quickly.</p>
<p>Speaking of fugliness, what&#8217;s up with the background on this site?  Wasn&#8217;t there a contest MONTHS ago that allowed readers to design a new background?  What ever happened to that?  This one actually isn&#8217;t that bad, though.  Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

